HARPONIAN
INTERNATIONAL

AI-Assisted Software Development

Version 1.0 Last updated: 2026-02-11

Enterprise-safe SDLC practices

Outcome: Use AI in the SDLC without introducing IP, privacy, or security risk.

SDLC-aligned practices for code generation, review, and secure use of AI tools.

Engineering & Architecture Scoped runtime Structured to support documented oversight, internal control alignment, and audit review

Implementation Outcome

This course covers safe use of AI across the software development lifecycle, focusing on IP protection, secure coding practices, and alignment with existing SDLC controls.

  • SDLC AI usage standard (by phase)
  • IP and confidential data protection checklist
  • Secure code review and verification workflow

Controls & Evidence

  • Designed for records retention, version control, and documented review cadence
  • Supports internal control alignment and defensible oversight practices
  • Produces an audit-reviewable evidence set suitable for internal audit request workflows

Data handling: No submission of sensitive or proprietary data is required to complete the program.

Risk Exposure

Lack of defensible policies or controls can result in significant, unmitigated enterprise risk exposure. This program addresses the risk areas most relevant to this capability.

Deliverables

SDLC AI Usage Standard

Phase-by-phase rules for design, coding, testing, and deployment.

IP & Confidentiality Guardrails

What cannot be submitted, how to sanitize inputs, and how to document.

Secure Coding & Review Workflow

Verification steps for AI-generated code and dependency risk.

Evidence Pack for Oversight

Artifacts suitable for engineering leadership and audit review.

Governance Lifecycle Integration

  1. Baseline: Establish policy-aligned use patterns and minimum control expectations across affected teams.
  2. Oversight: Assign accountable owners, decision rights, and escalation paths for AI-assisted activities.
  3. Monitoring: Define review cadence, metrics, and control checks aligned to operational reality.
  4. Documentation: Maintain version-controlled artifacts and evidence suitable for records retention and review.
  5. Audit Review: Enable internal audit and leadership review with traceable controls, decisions, and evidence.

Buyer Questions

Does this require sharing confidential data with the provider?

No. The program is designed for policy, controls, and safe-use practices. Participants can complete the program without submitting sensitive or proprietary data.

Who should attend?

Developers, DevOps, QA

What evidence is produced for audit review?

Version-controlled artifacts (policy templates, oversight workbook outputs, and control-aligned documentation) suitable for internal audit requests and governance reviews.

How is it deployed?

On-demand delivery with enterprise licensing options. LMS and SSO integration can be included in rollout scoping.

How are artifacts maintained over time?

Artifacts are designed for version control and periodic review. Organizations can align updates to internal change management and records retention requirements.

Request Enterprise Pricing

For rollout scoping (seat counts, deployment model, LMS/SSO integration, and licensing options), request enterprise pricing and deployment scope.

Contact
Email to Request Pricing or info@harponian.com
Procurement
PO / invoice supported • Bulk licensing • LMS optional • SSO optional