HARPONIAN
INTERNATIONAL

AI Risk for Boards & Executives

Version 1.0 Last updated: 2026-02-11

Board-level oversight and material risk framing

Outcome: Equip leaders with a board-ready AI risk view and oversight expectations.

Risk framing, accountability, reporting cadence, and decision questions.

Executive & Board Oversight Scoped runtime Structured to support documented oversight, internal control alignment, and audit review

Implementation Outcome

This executive briefing equips leaders with clarity on oversight, accountability, and regulatory expectations without technical depth.

  • Board oversight question set and briefing outline
  • AI risk register framing guide
  • Reporting cadence and metrics starter

Controls & Evidence

  • Designed for records retention, version control, and documented review cadence
  • Supports internal control alignment and defensible oversight practices
  • Produces an audit-reviewable evidence set suitable for internal audit request workflows

Data handling: No submission of sensitive or proprietary data is required to complete the program.

Risk Exposure

Lack of defensible policies or controls can result in significant, unmitigated enterprise risk exposure. This program addresses the risk areas most relevant to this capability.

Deliverables

Executive Briefing Deck Outline

Board-appropriate narrative, risk framing, and decisions.

Oversight Questions & Red Flags

What to ask, what to challenge, what evidence to request.

Risk Register Starter

Material risk categories with owners and evidence expectations.

Reporting Cadence Blueprint

KPIs, KRIs, and review intervals aligned to governance.

Governance Lifecycle Integration

  1. Baseline: Establish policy-aligned use patterns and minimum control expectations across affected teams.
  2. Oversight: Assign accountable owners, decision rights, and escalation paths for AI-assisted activities.
  3. Monitoring: Define review cadence, metrics, and control checks aligned to operational reality.
  4. Documentation: Maintain version-controlled artifacts and evidence suitable for records retention and review.
  5. Audit Review: Enable internal audit and leadership review with traceable controls, decisions, and evidence.

Buyer Questions

Does this require sharing confidential data with the provider?

No. The program is designed for policy, controls, and safe-use practices. Participants can complete the program without submitting sensitive or proprietary data.

Who should attend?

Board members, C-suite

What evidence is produced for audit review?

Version-controlled artifacts (policy templates, oversight workbook outputs, and control-aligned documentation) suitable for internal audit requests and governance reviews.

How is it deployed?

On-demand delivery with enterprise licensing options. LMS and SSO integration can be included in rollout scoping.

How are artifacts maintained over time?

Artifacts are designed for version control and periodic review. Organizations can align updates to internal change management and records retention requirements.

Request Enterprise Pricing

For rollout scoping (seat counts, deployment model, LMS/SSO integration, and licensing options), request enterprise pricing and deployment scope.

Contact
Email to Request Pricing or info@harponian.com
Procurement
PO / invoice supported • Bulk licensing • LMS optional • SSO optional